Closed DavidDragonsage closed 2 months ago
This is due to the difference caused by Comfyd upgrade, not a bug
I was suspecting that might be the case. This is an impairment in quality, although the degree of that impairment is quite variable.
Is is practical to roll back the Comfy upgrade or are there other issues that make the Comfy upgrade necessary?
Checklist
What happened?
In win_0916, images generated in Flux1 Dev has less detail than those generated using win_820. For any given image the logs show that all listed parameters are identical between the old and new releases of SimpleSDXL - yet the results are different. Please see the example images.
Steps to reproduce the problem
1) Start SimpleSDXL win_960 2) Find an Flux1 Dev image made using win_820 3) Load the image into the Metadata window and apply 4) Generate 5) Compare the images. If you check the image logs the parameters will be identical. The images should also be identical, but they are not.
What should have happened?
If you load the image metadata from an image made with win_820 and regenerate it in win_960 the results should be identical. If it is a Flux1 Dev image they are not. Sometimes the difference will be minor and sometimes the differences will be very obvious. Typically the image made with win_820 will contain more detail and follow the prompt more closely although this is not always the case. Sometimes the lack of detail will make the win_960 image appear to be less focused, especially if the detail is lacking around the eyes.
Another way to express this is to say that the images from win_960 tend to be more simple.
What browsers do you use to access Fooocus?
Mozilla Firefox
Where are you running Fooocus?
Locally
What operating system are you using?
Windows 10
Console logs
Additional information
The attached console log was for an image that I regenerated just now, chosen completely at random from those I made with win_820. The first attached image is from win_820 and the second image is from win_960.
The differences between these two are subtle. But notice that in the win_820 image the subject is wearing gloves, which is appropriate to the prompt and to the heavy clothing she is wearing: "full body long shot: a Kosovar adult woman (strides:1.2) through the autumn with a (benign:1.2) expression, 35mm lens, natural lighting, clearly defined facial features, sharp background, deep depth of field, (rim lighting:1.4)"
In the win_960 image she has lost her gloves. Also, the person who was following her and causing a blurred reflection is gone.
For more information and image logs, see also "Apparent Loss of Detail in Flux1 Dev from win_820 to win_0916 #76" in the Discussion section.