Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Oops, meant to add that as an issue, not a defect. Sorry!
Original comment by bitb...@gmail.com
on 29 Apr 2010 at 4:40
[deleted comment]
Thank you for your feedback. We wanted to develop our own color class for a
long
time although not for the same reason. This issue highlighted the importance of
it.
Thus we introduced our "own" color and dimension class in the current revision.
(trunk)
It would be great if you could test the current revision if it works in the
mentioned environment. We still have methods referring to java.awt classes.
However
those are not necessary to use the api anymore but are retained for
compatibility
reasons. Unfortunately I’m not sure whether this is enough modification for
the
mentioned environment. In normal circumstances our modifications would generate
runtime exceptions if the java.awt.* class is not available but a method using
it is
called. As you can avoid the usage now it should work.
Status changed to feedback needed.
Original comment by mart-...@gmx.net
on 30 Apr 2010 at 7:02
Original comment by mart-...@gmx.net
on 30 Apr 2010 at 7:02
Just tried it out (simple stuff, just a couple of pie charts) and the
replacements
for Dimension and Color seem to work fine! I'll let you know if I run into
anything, but it looks like that fixed it... dang, you guys are fast! Thanks
for
your help
Original comment by bitb...@gmail.com
on 2 May 2010 at 10:01
Allright! Thank you.
(We still hope that more classes from the java.awt. package will be whitelisted
for use in an GAE environment if they are useful to the development community.)
Original comment by mart-...@gmx.net
on 11 Aug 2010 at 5:29
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bitb...@gmail.com
on 29 Apr 2010 at 4:38