Open Ovewh opened 7 months ago
Actually this never properly implemented back to issue #51
Just from reading the old discussion. I do not think that we should have "fixed" period for climatology, but rather have a default one. Especially since 2005 - 2015 is almost 10 years ago and we have new and different observations now, which did not exist back them.
Describe the bug Please provide a clear and concise description of what the bug is.
To Reproduce My config.py file:
Expected behavior What pyaerocom should do is to read the obs data for the specified period. Calculate the climatology of specified frequency i.e. either monthly or yearly and it should be assign the same time axis as the model data.
Issues to start fixing:
set_year = None
. Worked for Jonas experiment since he used the year 2010 and "climatology" is defined between 2005 and 2015.