Open jgriesfeller opened 1 week ago
I would say we should ask the modelers how they want the comparison done and then we implement that rather than us coming up with a solution which they might not be satisfied with. If we are to include this data, what should we do with it? If no solution is given, then it is fair to throw out this station.
@lewisblake agreed. The "probblem" right now is that the station is not ignored automatically. (Yes, I should have mentioned that above) Pyaerocom's focus is to get as much data as possible.
This concerns all types of EBAS readers...
From EMEP report 2022:
How it is today (to my best knowledge): Because the colocation can't handle time colocation with start and stop times. it has to assume a certain time step size and do the colocation on the middle points. We do accept small deviations from the time step sizes we have (details are here: https://github.com/metno/pyaerocom/blob/b06cfde9eeb62efc8e4d5dee38afda00a1196632/pyaerocom/tstype.py#L22-L42
But the devil might like in the details of the reader implementations