Closed mtkp closed 8 years ago
Regarding my question in the PR description - I forged ahead with tests that are isolated with the same extension wrapper as the source extensions.
👍
Thanks for the contribution!
No problem! @ikitommi - I mentioned this in a comment above... what are your thoughts on making joda-time
/clj-time
an optional dependency using this extension approach?
I think it's a good idea. We are finalizing Muuntaja, which uses similar approach with ring versions.
is there a reason why support for java.time.LocalDateTime was not included in this PR? was it intentional or accidental? Thanks!
Taking a crack at #107 - support for
java.time.Instant
,java.time.LocalDate
, andjava.time.LocalTime
.I haven't written tests for
java.time
-specific extensions yet... should these tests be conditionally evaluated as well, to only run tests if testing in an environment that has java 1.8+?