Open tkwilos opened 1 year ago
@tkwilos are you literally talking about the formatting (font, size, color, etc.)? I think the content looks identical, right?
Yeah we changed the format when we changed how the docs get generated. I thought we had sent updated templates, but regardless the new format is the standard.
@seth127 yes sorry I'm talking about the formatting, not the content itself.
It seems then, potentially I'm out of sync with the expected format of these tables...looking at the template Mike C sent me for the Metworx management portal 4.0 validation and comparing it to the docs produced here, we're not quite aligned.
This will warrant further discussion amongst Seth G, Mike C, and maybe others.
Currently, the table listing the tests in the Metworx Requirements Specification document does not match the format on our official, QA reviewed/approved template.
For reference, here is the version presently produced via
mrgvalidate
:And here is the version on the current version of the template: