Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Original comment by api.roman.public@gmail.com
on 26 Jul 2009 at 6:46
A very promising lead is http://code.google.com/p/asynctools/, which might make
IN
queries parallelizable. This would boost performance for both proximity and
bounding
box queries.
We should highly consider using asynctools!
Original comment by api.roman.public@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2009 at 4:04
Almost done in withasync branch:
http://code.google.com/p/geomodel/source/browse/#svn/branches/withasync
Original comment by api.roman.public@gmail.com
on 6 Oct 2009 at 9:52
was this merged into trunk?
Original comment by ghi...@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2010 at 8:19
Nope, not merged yet. When I have some time to work on this, I'll merge into
trunk. This
should add a nice boost to performance.
Original comment by api.roman.public@gmail.com
on 24 Feb 2010 at 2:18
Is the version in branches/withasync stable? Very interested in trying it out
...
Original comment by stephen....@gmail.com
on 4 Mar 2010 at 10:15
It is stable, I just haven't had the time to merge it intro trunk and make a
release out of it. Also still weighing
options for packaging up asynctools into the source directly.
Original comment by api.roman.public@gmail.com
on 8 Mar 2010 at 11:48
Looking forward to this release.
Original comment by aaron.je...@gmail.com
on 5 Mar 2011 at 9:40
Can proximity queries be optimized sufficiently at all? With a cpm of $0.36 and
1 request per second you burn $10000 a year. That's too much. Even if we could
slash the query cost in half ist still a lot. Any thoughts?
Original comment by katz...@gmail.com
on 1 May 2011 at 6:27
Any ETA on when/if this is likely to show up would be appreciated!
Original comment by j...@simplylisted.com
on 25 Sep 2011 at 2:44
Please, merge withasync into trunk!
Original comment by flavioju...@gmail.com
on 14 Oct 2011 at 4:36
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
api.roman.public@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2009 at 6:39