Closed Farnazmdi closed 2 years ago
Merging #940 (1775de6) into master (67901c7) will increase coverage by
1.78%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #940 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.92% 82.71% +1.78%
==========================================
Files 28 28
Lines 2202 2239 +37
==========================================
+ Hits 1782 1852 +70
+ Misses 420 387 -33
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 82.71% <100.00%> (+1.78%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
lineage/Viterbi.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
lineage/Analyze.py | 87.91% <100.00%> (+1.24%) |
:arrow_up: |
lineage/UpwardRecursion.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
lineage/crossval.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
lineage/states/StateDistributionGaPhs.py | 96.33% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
lineage/states/StateDistributionGamma.py | 95.10% <100.00%> (+6.99%) |
:arrow_up: |
lineage/tests/test_CrossVal.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
lineage/tHMM.py | 97.00% <0.00%> (+1.00%) |
:arrow_up: |
lineage/states/stateCommon.py | 71.42% <0.00%> (+1.29%) |
:arrow_up: |
... and 2 more |
:mega: Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more
@aarmey For the unit tests, I only used synthetic data and figure 19 now is a kind of benchmarking for the cross validation with synthetic data: I committed it because it takes more than 30 minutes to build. Something is fundamentally different between synthetic and experimental data and causes the Emission likelihood to be all zeros for some lineages and I will try to figure out what it is in another branch. Also, I think I know how to implement your suggestion about using probabilities of cells belonging to each state for cross validation, I will do that in another branch, too. If you agree with these changes, it should be ready to merge.
@Farnazmdi let me know how this works with the experimental data.
This branch is purely edits related to cross validation.