Closed ethanhung11 closed 2 years ago
Merging #40 (97cbda9) into main (423a731) will decrease coverage by
7.25%
. The diff coverage is2.77%
.:exclamation: Current head 97cbda9 differs from pull request most recent head b8ee6f2. Consider uploading reports for the commit b8ee6f2 to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #40 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 87.67% 80.42% -7.26%
==========================================
Files 7 8 +1
Lines 568 618 +50
==========================================
- Hits 498 497 -1
- Misses 70 121 +51
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 80.42% <2.77%> (-7.26%) |
:arrow_down: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
tensorpack/plot.py | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
tensorpack/test/common.py | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
tensorpack/test/test_decomposition.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
tensorpack/decomposition.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 423a731...b8ee6f2. Read the comment docs.
pos has been removed
I've fixed the first and third issues, but for 2) how should I notate large negative values? The graphs graph the mean and standard mean error and do not actually show individual negative outliers. Is there a standard practice for this?
You can leave the individual outliers alone. From what I see component >=3 are entirely blank, so we certainly need to make it better. Merge this PR first, and we can open a new one to solve this.
fixing up plots.py, added common.py for testing purposes (can remove later if unnecessary)