Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 22
model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 530 @ 1.73GHz
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 1728.822
cache size : 1024 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc
arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr
pdcm lahf_lm
bogomips : 3457.64
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
Original comment by vi0...@gmail.com
on 5 Oct 2010 at 10:56
Attachments:
For example, it does not happen (at least not so sereve) at a70e19757bcb.
Original comment by vi0...@gmail.com
on 5 Oct 2010 at 11:07
I have the same problem, I tried the compcache from the kernels 2.6.36-ck5,
2.6.36-zen1 and the git from zen-sources, the behaviour are the same in all
these versions, when the zram0 swap started to being used, some programs
started to crash at random.
There is something I can do to help fix or find where it is the issue? and,
there is some revision that I can use that does not show the issue?
Thanks!
Original comment by sezd...@gmail.com
on 7 Jan 2011 at 9:40
The code in the repository in now sync'ed with the mainline which has quite
stable zram implementation. So, Can you please pull and try again? or try
2.6.37 kernel directly.
I think this is a dup of Issue 82.
Original comment by nitingupta910@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2011 at 12:02
OK, trying one that from:
f09409654329b015a2ddbb143e9ef019e241182d "zen: tag zen0: Inanimate Antler"
2.6.37-zen0
git log -- drivers/staging/zram:
commit 2bd0180e329902237bf8e670313b98fba65f21b6
Author: Jan Steffens <jan.steffens@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Sep 20 21:27:22 2010 +0200
Fix zram for 7b6d91d
Will report here about results.
Original comment by vi0...@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2011 at 2:25
Tested: fails:
http://vi-server.org/vi/_/dmesg_zram.txt
Please tell the exact revision number (of kernel or of compcache) to test.
Original comment by vi0...@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2011 at 2:43
Testing 9b2f40a12393: no crashes yet.
P.S. notify_free is always 0. Is it the wrong behaviour?
Original comment by vi0...@gmail.com
on 24 Jan 2011 at 1:45
notify mechanism is applicable only when zram is used as swap disk. When used
to host a filesystem, it will always remain zero.
Original comment by nitingupta910@gmail.com
on 27 Jan 2011 at 3:30
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
vi0...@gmail.com
on 5 Oct 2010 at 10:48