It would be useful to document what is required to reach "full documentation" status (as used to pull information into the warnings page). It would also be useful to be able to define or reduce the requirements for full documentation if it is more than just documenting all fields, param, keywords (i.e. the obvious required elements).
Added to help page in r449:
To be fully documented, a routine must have routine comments, document each parameter/keyword, and, if a function, document its return value.
It would be useful to document what is required to reach "full documentation" status (as used to pull information into the warnings page). It would also be useful to be able to define or reduce the requirements for full documentation if it is more than just documenting all fields, param, keywords (i.e. the obvious required elements).