Closed matt-graham closed 3 years ago
Submitting as part of JOSS review openjournals/joss-reviews#3397
https://github.com/mggg/ecological-inference/blob/2d47262e413a4e17db1eead0924cff164e57f01b/paper/paper.md#L68
'i.i.d.' should be defined on first usage, also independent may be better as 'i.i.d. samples from the posterior distribution' is somewhat redundant as 'from the posterior distribution' already implies the samples are identically distributed.
Submitting as part of JOSS review openjournals/joss-reviews#3397
https://github.com/mggg/ecological-inference/blob/2d47262e413a4e17db1eead0924cff164e57f01b/paper/paper.md#L68
'i.i.d.' should be defined on first usage, also independent may be better as 'i.i.d. samples from the posterior distribution' is somewhat redundant as 'from the posterior distribution' already implies the samples are identically distributed.