Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Using latest version of JasmineAdapter at:
https://raw.github.com/ibolmo/jasmine-jstd-adapter/master/src/JasmineAdapter.js
Original comment by dan...@gmail.com
on 16 Apr 2012 at 7:13
I have compensated by creating an extra test, but for those that do not know of
this bug, it could be a critical problem, since they may push buggy code into
production.
Original comment by dan...@gmail.com
on 18 Apr 2012 at 1:27
Do you see this without the jasmine adapter?
Original comment by corbinrs...@gmail.com
on 18 Apr 2012 at 2:21
I get "Unable to attach test reporter to test framework or test framework quit
unexpectedly" if I don't have the JasmineAdapter. I was under the impression it
was necessary to run Jasmine Tests which is all that I'm using at present.
I can say that the tests run properly when I run them with JsTestDriver.jar
from the command line. However, there is always at least one test dropped when
I run them from within the JetBrains IDE with the plugin.
Original comment by dan...@gmail.com
on 18 Apr 2012 at 2:37
I meant a non-Jasmine test, but it sounds like it might be something in the IDE
plugin. Sergey?
Original comment by corbinrs...@gmail.com
on 18 Apr 2012 at 2:44
This bug seems to have been 'fixed' by the latest plug-in
Version 117.222, 2012 April (build on JsTestDriver-1.3.4.b)
Original comment by dan...@gmail.com
on 18 Apr 2012 at 2:58
The problem is that your tests have the same name: "should be able to add
numbers".
IDE plugin assumes that there are no two tests with the same name that is why
"JSTestDriver" node (this name was passed as the first argument to the
'describe' function call) in test result tree has only one child node - "should
be able to add numbers".
I believe that in some cases such assumption could be harmful.
I'll try to fix it (a little investigation is needed).
BTW I run the test from the issue description in 1.4.1 and 117.222 versions of
the plugin and behavior was the same -- "Done: 1 of 1 Failed: 1".
Original comment by Sergey.S...@gmail.com
on 18 Apr 2012 at 7:13
It's only possible in Jasmine, I think.
Original comment by corbinrs...@gmail.com
on 18 Apr 2012 at 7:30
Original comment by Sergey.S...@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2012 at 4:01
I have a problem with ruining jasmine test from testdriver plug in. Cannot read
[
/tmp/.m2/repository/org/testng/testng/6.7/testng-6.7.jar!/testng-reports.js
/home/clouway/.m2/repository/org/testng/testng/6.7/testng-6.7.jar!/testng-reports.js
] derived from
.m2/repository/org/testng/testng/6.7/testng-6.7.jar!/testng-reports.js
Cannot read [
/tmp/.m2/repository/org/testng/testng/6.7/testng-6.7.jar!/jquery-1.7.1.min.js
/home/clouway/.m2/repository/org/testng/testng/6.7/testng-6.7.jar!/jquery-1.7.1.min.js
] derived from
.m2/repository/org/testng/testng/6.7/testng-6.7.jar!/jquery-1.7.1.min.js
at com.google.jstestdriver.PathResolver.resolve(PathResolver.java:98)
at com.google.jstestdriver.config.ParsedConfiguration.resolvePaths(ParsedConfiguration.java:99)
at com.google.jstestdriver.config.Initializer.initialize(Initializer.java:86)
at com.google.jstestdriver.embedded.JsTestDriverImpl.createRunnerInjector(JsTestDriverImpl.java:368)
at com.google.jstestdriver.embedded.JsTestDriverImpl.runConfigurationWithFlags(JsTestDriverImpl.java:342)
at com.google.jstestdriver.embedded.JsTestDriverImpl.runConfiguration(JsTestDriverImpl.java:233)
at com.google.jstestdriver.idea.TestRunner.runTests(TestRunner.java:195)
at com.google.jstestdriver.idea.TestRunner.executeTestCase(TestRunner.java:131)
at com.google.jstestdriver.idea.TestRunner.unsafeExecuteConfig(TestRunner.java:122)
at com.google.jstestdriver.idea.TestRunner.executeConfig(TestRunner.java:97)
at com.google.jstestdriver.idea.TestRunner.executeAll(TestRunner.java:88)
at com.google.jstestdriver.idea.TestRunner.main(TestRunner.java:330)
Original comment by Fireball...@gmail.com
on 11 Sep 2012 at 10:53
@Fireball183, what JsTestDriver IntelliJ plugin version are you using?
How is it possible to reproduce the issue?
Original comment by Sergey.S...@gmail.com
on 11 Sep 2012 at 2:05
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dan...@gmail.com
on 16 Apr 2012 at 7:08