search

mgttlinger / biblatex-lncs

BiBLaTeX style for Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science
LaTeX Project Public License v1.3c
17 stars 3 forks source link

Default ordering in example does not match that of splncs04 #11

Closed tvercaut closed 1 year ago

tvercaut commented 1 year ago

The basic usage https://github.com/mgttlinger/biblatex-lncs#usage and example https://github.com/mgttlinger/biblatex-lncs/blob/1ddaef8f311a06e43b2186a9446761a5e0103cf9/biblatex-lncs-test.tex#L3 do not end up with the same order as splncs04.

For ease of use, it would be good to align this with the splncs04 behaviour. I believe this can be done by adding sorting=nyt to the package options.

mgttlinger commented 1 year ago

I think I'd rather leave the sorting unchanged as the file is not a usage example but rather a file for testing the style output where it is much easier to have no automatic sorting and append new test cases at the end. The usage example in the Readme doesn't include the sorting=none so that should be fine, right?

tvercaut commented 1 year ago

Thanks. That's correct re "basic usage" notes. I hadn't tried removing sorting=none and (wrongly) assumed this was the default. A quick test seems to indicate that the default is appropriate.

I also understand the rationale for the test case.