Closed tvercaut closed 1 year ago
I think I'd rather leave the sorting unchanged as the file is not a usage example but rather a file for testing the style output where it is much easier to have no automatic sorting and append new test cases at the end. The usage example in the Readme doesn't include the sorting=none
so that should be fine, right?
Thanks. That's correct re "basic usage" notes. I hadn't tried removing sorting=none
and (wrongly) assumed this was the default. A quick test seems to indicate that the default is appropriate.
I also understand the rationale for the test case.
The basic usage https://github.com/mgttlinger/biblatex-lncs#usage and example https://github.com/mgttlinger/biblatex-lncs/blob/1ddaef8f311a06e43b2186a9446761a5e0103cf9/biblatex-lncs-test.tex#L3 do not end up with the same order as splncs04.
For ease of use, it would be good to align this with the splncs04 behaviour. I believe this can be done by adding
sorting=nyt
to the package options.