Removed Baltimore & Kansas City

mheadd commented 9 years ago

Took these two cities out of the list, as I don't think either is community-managed. Both - I think - are controlled 100% by their respective city governments.

If I'm wrong about this, please feel free to add back.

roacobb commented 9 years ago

@mheadd are we defining "community-managed" as the city gov't has no input on data or management? Please excuse my education deficit on this.

mheadd commented 9 years ago

We should probably define this more formally, but I think the model we want to employ here is that the site:

Not be under the unilateral control of government - government can be a part of the managing body, and provide input, but the site is not under the direct purview of a government body.
Government may contribute data to the site, but is not the sole contributor.

The Philadelphia open data portal is a good example of this.

mattbailey0 commented 9 years ago

FWIW I think that's a pretty strong definition for our purposes here. "Control" might be worth teasing out a bit, but this feels fairly rigorous to me.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Mark Headd notifications@github.com wrote:

We should probably define this more formally, but I think the model we want to employ here is that the site:

-

Not be under the unilateral control of government - government can be a part of the managing body, and provide input, but the site is not under the direct purview of a government body.

Government may contribute data to the site, but is not the sole contributor.

The Philadelphia open data portal https://www.opendataphilly.org/about is a good example of this.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/mheadd/communitydata.io/issues/14#issuecomment-97515909 .

mheadd / communitydata.io

Removed Baltimore & Kansas City #14

Not be under the unilateral control of government - government can be a part of the managing body, and provide input, but the site is not under the direct purview of a government body.