[ISSUE-68] Improved Specs and Added Coverage Report

[jlurena]

Summary

• Removed support for Ruby < 3.0
• Removed support for Rails < 6.1
• Added Coverage Report to Github CI
• Added Linter to Github CI
• Updated RSpec to use latest syntax and updated specs
• Updated to a breaking version, 9.0

[jlurena]

@mhgbrown Any reason we are maintaining ruby < 3.0?

https://endoflife.date/ruby

Everything under 3.0 hit EOL

Edit: @mhgbrown if you'd consider this I also did the following:

• Removed support for Ruby < 3.0
• Removed support for Rails < 6.1
• Added Coverage Report to Github CI
• Added Linter to Github CI
• Updated RSpec to use latest syntax and updated specs
• Updated to a breaking version, 9.0

[mhgbrown]

No particular reason other than to be most widely compatible. I'm down to move forward and support versions that are "living".

[jlurena]

This is great stuff and really moves the project forward. I left some questions for you.

It is done. Please review again. @mhgbrown

[jlurena]

This is great stuff and really moves the project forward. I left some questions for you.

It is done. Please review again. @mhgbrown

@mhgbrown I can merge but I'd need you to publish 😄

[mhgbrown]

I'll get on it later today

[jlurena]

I'll get on it later today

@mhgbrown 👀

[mhgbrown]

@jlurena Lawd, sorry. This week suddenly became a week of interviewing/doing a trial at a company. Why remove the concurrency option?

[jlurena]

@jlurena Lawd, sorry. This week suddenly became a week of interviewing/doing a trial at a company. Why remove the concurrency option?

After research and practical tests, it actually performed really bad. Tested with a redis cache and a memcache cache. Performance degraded significantly. It was visibly slower. @italijancic-th helped test

[mhgbrown]

ok got it! I'll merge it in!

[mhgbrown]

@jlurena finally released: https://rubygems.org/gems/cached_resource