I appreciate you changing the name of the argument and keeping both ways of saying it as valid options. I noticed the name of the process still says tags though. Would you consider changing it to indices on (currently) lines 59, 62, 68, 72 and 605 (I think that's all) so it shows up as indices in the file names and CLI progress reports? Besides just wanting to name them correctly, I imagine this could be a point of confusion in the case where someone uses both illumina indices and tagged primers on the same sequencing run. This process only deals with ambiguous indices while ambiguous tags on metabarcoding primers would be dealt with in ngsfilter. Thanks!
I appreciate you changing the name of the argument and keeping both ways of saying it as valid options. I noticed the name of the process still says tags though. Would you consider changing it to indices on (currently) lines 59, 62, 68, 72 and 605 (I think that's all) so it shows up as indices in the file names and CLI progress reports? Besides just wanting to name them correctly, I imagine this could be a point of confusion in the case where someone uses both illumina indices and tagged primers on the same sequencing run. This process only deals with ambiguous indices while ambiguous tags on metabarcoding primers would be dealt with in ngsfilter. Thanks!