The current contribution checklist used is arguably lengthy, unnecessarily complicated (language and terminology), and often not appropriate (e.g. a lot of developer only related content).
๐ฐ User value
Less complicated process means easier and quicker submissions, as well as remove any potential barriers to entry (e.g. putting people off contributing).
๐ Acceptance Criteria
Given I want to submit a new component design
When it comes to using the checklist
Then it is simple to follow and understand
โฏ๐งพ Guidance
Recommended: keep what is useful from current checklist (but perhaps rephrase some of it into clearer instructions), include any additional checks or things to consider for the design.
Perhaps also worth including instructions on the Figma file structure (e.g. what each page in the file is meant for).
Summary
Simplify Figma component contribution checklist
๐ฌ Description
The current contribution checklist used is arguably lengthy, unnecessarily complicated (language and terminology), and often not appropriate (e.g. a lot of developer only related content).
๐ฐ User value
Less complicated process means easier and quicker submissions, as well as remove any potential barriers to entry (e.g. putting people off contributing).
๐ Acceptance Criteria
Given I want to submit a new component design When it comes to using the checklist Then it is simple to follow and understand
โฏ๐งพ Guidance
Recommended: keep what is useful from current checklist (but perhaps rephrase some of it into clearer instructions), include any additional checks or things to consider for the design.
Perhaps also worth including instructions on the Figma file structure (e.g. what each page in the file is meant for).