Open zreitz opened 1 year ago
For the reasons given here; I think this comment fell through the cracks:
In addition to this, I would be in favour of removing BGC0001817 (vancosamine), because: it is only producing one of the three intermediate product for BGC0001619 it is not a gene cluster (some genes are 74kb apart) the other sugar BGC for rhamnose, also required for vancosamine synthesis, is not in MIBiG anyway
In addition to this, I would be in favour of removing BGC0001817 (vancosamine), because:
Originally posted by @althonos in https://github.com/mibig-secmet/mibig-json/issues/161#issuecomment-989945265
This issue is being addressed in the ongoing curation effort.
For the reasons given here; I think this comment fell through the cracks:
Originally posted by @althonos in https://github.com/mibig-secmet/mibig-json/issues/161#issuecomment-989945265