DBSCAN cannot cluster data sets well with large differences in densities, since the minPts-ε combination cannot then be chosen appropriately for all clusters.
This might mean that I get better results for determine a clustering parameter set for 30 classifications, and then splitting up tiles that have more than that into 2 or 3 subsets with each having comparable densities, then produce a mean result somehow out of this after.
This is being dealt with in #12, so I'm closing this in favor of it. It's better to deal with it in proportion to classifications than to artificially split the data up.
DBSCAN cannot cluster data sets well with large differences in densities, since the minPts-ε combination cannot then be chosen appropriately for all clusters. This might mean that I get better results for determine a clustering parameter set for 30 classifications, and then splitting up tiles that have more than that into 2 or 3 subsets with each having comparable densities, then produce a mean result somehow out of this after.