approach I'm taking for 9179 and must_lay_together makes the PRIVATE_CLOSE_AFTER_PASS stuff unnecessary for the extra tile lay privates; might also want to consider the same approach for P21 in 1822+; leaving that code probably doesn't hurt anything but would be better to clean up
approach I'm taking for 9179 and
must_lay_togethermakes thePRIVATE_CLOSE_AFTER_PASSstuff unnecessary for the extra tile lay privates; might also want to consider the same approach for P21 in 1822+; leaving that code probably doesn't hurt anything but would be better to clean up