Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I second, will this be hard? ;-)
Original comment by vivacar...@gmail.com
on 9 May 2007 at 9:46
I can't comment on ease/difficulty (I have no hand in code) but the prospect of
ZFS is extraordinarily appealing to
me.
Veering slightly off-topic ... a few days ago, Windows 2000 did something
unimaginably horrible by deleting —
without warning (by Microsoft's design) — a Guest's profile in its entirety.
Windows over-wrote — made
unrecoverable — valuable irreplaceable data that was not backed up; the
Guest's documents had been
successfully saved mere moments before Windows marked that disk space as free
</end rant>
— it's operating system nightmares like that that make me yearn for a filing
system such as ZFS!
Original comment by grahampe...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2007 at 11:25
if ZFS will be (as it seems) the default or one of the choice FS for Leopard,
it has
any meaning to develop a plugin for MacFuse, as ZFS will be natively supported?
Original comment by danielem...@gmail.com
on 10 Jun 2007 at 11:56
For users of Mac OS X 10.4: a ZFS plug-in to MacFusion will be useful.
For users of Mac OS X 10.5: even if users have the option of
_conversion_ from HFS+ to ZFS <http://storagemojo.com/?p=475> some people may
have a short- or long-
term preference for HFS+. Example:
* user has just one disk, the startup disk, with just one HFS+ partition
* user wishes to benefit from ZFS snapshot and rollback
for some but not all of their data
without partitioning the startup disk
* user benefits from ZFS plug-in to MacFusion.
This assumes that a ZFS plug-in may use a path (as EncFS.plugin uses a path)
— not an entire volume or disk
— for storage.
Feasibility etc. should be clearer after WWDC announcements.
Original comment by grahampe...@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2007 at 1:28
It would seem (in the absence of knowing anything about any of this) that
starting
from the Linux ZFS plugin to FUSE would be a reasonable place to begin ...
hmmm... I seem to be not connecting to the home site for that, so maybe not, it
may
be deceased.
Original comment by david.le...@gmail.com
on 18 Jun 2007 at 8:24
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
grahampe...@gmail.com
on 6 May 2007 at 11:35