Open michaelonken opened 2 years ago
More context: Right now Ulcer uses the SCT 56208002 code ("Ulcer (morphologic abnormality"), i.e.
The proposal is to allow a more specific coding by facilitating one of the child codes 56208002, which tell more about the specific abnormality of the Ulcer than the parent code does. One of these two ways are proposed:
I think we should also try to keep the original value coding ("superficial" or "deep" or "no" or "procedure not done") and do a slicing on Observation.value[x].
From the two proposals I'd personally prefer 1.
[via data4life]
Ulcus: Might it be possible to use one of the child-codes of SNOMED 56208002 (“Ulcer (morphologic abnormality)“) here? Either as the result (with a generic code for examniation) or as the code itself, with
value[x]
left out (cf. Observation code patterns 1 & 4 from the FHIR spec)