Closed skyebend closed 11 years ago
The charts are across all years
-----Original Message----- From: Skye Bender-deMoll notifications@github.com To: michalgm/state_dem state_dem@noreply.github.com Sent: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 5:22 PM Subject: [state_dem] doughnut for BP shows indpependent contribs, but no indpendent candidate linked to on graph (#45)
Looking at BP in CA Senate. When I look through the various years, I never see a tie to and indepdent candidate, yet a slice for independent shows up on the dougnut. Is it from a earlier year we don't have a graph for? Or is the company doughnut aggregating across multiple states?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/michalgm/state_dem/issues/45
So currently
This seems like it might be kind of confusing. Maybe each thing should show a caption or tool tip when clicked on?
No - the total is the total for the graph node everything else is current company across all years/states/chambers
On 07/29/2013 05:54 PM, Skye Bender-deMoll wrote:
So currently
- The total at the top is for the current company in the current cycle/chamber/sate
- The timeline is for the company in current chamber/state across all years (including ones without graphs)
- Ditto the doughnut?
- The CSV is for current company across all years, states, and chambers
This seems like it might be kind of confusing. Maybe each thing should show a caption or tool tip when clicked on?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/michalgm/state_dem/issues/45#issuecomment-21762882.
I'm closing this as 'wontfix'. If you think we should change the spec, can you file a new issue or retitle this one? (will probably get pushed to later milestone)
Looking at BP in CA Senate. When I look through the various years, I never see a tie to and indepdent candidate, yet a slice for independent shows up on the dougnut. Is it from a earlier year we don't have a graph for? Or is the company doughnut aggregating across multiple states?