Closed wujastyk closed 2 years ago
I was advised to post my investigation details here as well:
The same shows up also under Jabref options>preferences>entry preview
. Not all citationstyles do have this duplication, but many do. For some it is the journal
or series
fields, for some it only is the number
field.
I also tested an entry with Zotero and there it works fine:
Thompson, Mark R. ‘Middle-Class Remorse: Re-Embracing Liberal Democracy in the Philippines and Thailand’. Global Asia, vol. 15, no. 1, East Asia Foundation, Mar. 2020, pp. 60–64.
In Jabref we have the dublicate:
Furthermore, I checked with Winmerge if the citation-style code is any different between the ones used by Zotero (https://www.zotero.org/styles/modern-language-association) and the one from Jabref (Options>preferences>entry preview>Modern Language Association 9th edition
) and there was no difference, except ONE difference and that was, according to Winmerge, both used different line-break format.
The method that allowed me to extract the citation-style code from Jabref was to go to (Options>preferences>entry preview>Modern Language Association 9th edition>edit) and copy paste it into the editor (= the text editor on Windows 10) and save it as a textfile and then compare it with the one from Zotero.
Not sure if the line-break format is applied by saving the style in 'Editor' or if it is created by citeproc-java or rather by Jabref.
I hope that helps in solving this
This issue is now fixed in citeproc-java v3.0.0-alpha.3
This is an issue that has arisen in the context of using this library in JabRef (JabRef issue)
JabRef version
Latest development branch build (please note build date below)
Operating system
GNU / Linux
Details on version and operating system
JabRef 5.4--2021-11-25--7aaf5e2 Linux 5.11.0-40-generic amd64 Java 16.0.2 JavaFX 17.0.1+1
Checked with the latest development build
Steps to reproduce the behaviour
Journal:
Book in series:
I have tried a dozen or so different preview styles. Above are "Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed" and "Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy", but it's the same whatever style I choose.
I wouldn't mind editing the preview template to my liking, but that's currently not available
Appendix