Closed pbihler closed 9 years ago
Thanks for you PR @pbihler. Maybe undefined
expectation makes more sense?
Yes, you're right. I refactored the code, so "null" and "undefined" are both handled individually
After this small label change we can merge.
Sounds good. "to be null" as well...
Thanks @pbihler
Released in 1.1.0
To allow testing for the absence of properties