Closed bb closed 10 months ago
Ah, i didn't know there was a specific nullmx version of the implicit MX server, but of course there is!
Pull requests are greatly appreciated!
See #207. Feedback welcome 😊
I've released version 5.0.0.
Thank you so much for your contribution!
Thanks for the quick responses ⚡ and for the new release 🚀 . I already updated and now wait for CI.
Please add support for NullMX as defined in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7505
TLDR: Domains without an MX record but with an A record want to receive mails via A record. This is already implemented with the "strict" option. If a domain owner really does not want to receive mails, they need to specify a null MX record. A null MX is specified as preference number 0 and a zero length label, written in master files as
.
Example Domain with this configuration:
gmail.de
Expectation
Both in strict mode and non-strict mode:
Observation
gmail.de is valid in non-strict mode. (I didn't test strict.)