Closed hnimminh closed 2 years ago
Thanks to @miconda for awesome tool,
I just found a minor issue with the sipexer use the map to store the extra-header via -xh, that cause for only the latest one can be processed. Example:
[info] [sipexer.go:1260] main.SIPExerDialogLoop(): local socket address: 127.0.0.1:53256 (udp) [info] [sipexer.go:1261] main.SIPExerDialogLoop(): local via address: 127.0.0.1:53256 [info] [sipexer.go:1262] main.SIPExerDialogLoop(): sending to udp 127.0.0.1:5060: [[--- INVITE sip:127.0.0.1:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:53256;rport;branch=z9hG4bKSG.256b7e98-b824-47ae-bac8-a2c3aadf9281 From: <sip:+9876543210@localhost>;tag=d3107dc4-7f35-481c-b58f-e351e2704027 To: <sip:alice@localhost> Call-ID: f5ccddd4-da36-48d7-b218-63cff5cdca0c CSeq: 275785 INVITE Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 16:23:20 +07 User-Agent: SIPExer v1.0.0 Content-Length: 208 Diversion: <john@example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp v=0 o=sipexer 1653470600 1653470600 IN IP4 127.0.0.1 s=call c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1 t=0 0 m=audio 37009 RTP 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000 a=rtpmap:8 pcma/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=sendrecv [info] [sipexer.go:1264] main.SIPExerDialogLoop(): ---]]
only the john@example.com is processed. We expected that the message would be:
john@example.com
... Diversion: <alice@kamailio.io> Diversion: <john@example.com> ...
Reference: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3261#section-7.3.1
Thanks, PR merged!
Thanks to @miconda for awesome tool,
I just found a minor issue with the sipexer use the map to store the extra-header via -xh, that cause for only the latest one can be processed. Example:
only the
john@example.com
is processed. We expected that the message would be:Reference: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3261#section-7.3.1