Open cmungall opened 3 years ago
I would also very much like to make sure we address the peptide quantification versus/in addition to protein quantification, whether these can/should be separate JSON entities or collapsed/grouped as you were suggesting. Once we have actual results with which to play it ought be easier to suss out the best path.
In the run up to GSP we rapidly added many classes and fields to be able to accomodate all omics workflows and outputs. Post GSP we should return to this and fully document these, and map to existing ontologies where possible.
In some cases we have good documentation, but we still need to map to existing standards/ontologies; e.g
these terms could be mapped to metaP standards from PSI, or potentially OBI
We should create an enum for data object type and have the values mapped to the appropriate ontology. We need to determine if OBI, EDAM, or SWO is appropriate here.
There are a lot of unmapped fields for metagenome assembly and MAGs.
to be determined if this is in scope for an existing ontology or if the nmdc schema fields can be a proposed new standard