Currently, linkml_to_dh_light arranges DH sections in alphabetical order, and arranges columns alphabetically within those sections based on their Column Header (which becomes their LinkML titles)
There is one exception: any column that is asserted to be an identifier within LinkML will be put first/leftmost in it's section, and sections with any identifier are arranged first/leftmost within the DH template.
To what extent should the row order in Soil-NMDC-Template_Compiled determine column order within our DH templates?
@mslarae13 it looks like only one person can be assigned to an issue in microbiomedata/nmdc-metadata?! I also consider myself an assignee for this one. I guess we can just @-mention other people to get their attention.
Currently, linkml_to_dh_light arranges DH sections in alphabetical order, and arranges columns alphabetically within those sections based on their
Column Header
(which becomes their LinkMLtitle
s)There is one exception: any column that is asserted to be an identifier within LinkML will be put first/leftmost in it's section, and sections with any identifier are arranged first/leftmost within the DH template.
To what extent should the row order in Soil-NMDC-Template_Compiled determine column order within our DH templates?
@mslarae13 it looks like only one person can be assigned to an issue in microbiomedata/nmdc-metadata?! I also consider myself an assignee for this one. I guess we can just @-mention other people to get their attention.
See also:
417