Open ssarrafan opened 2 years ago
@emileyfadrosh moving this to the backlog. Let me know if it should be assigned to someone else. FYI @dehays
Finally looked at these. Are we going to leave the metaG data that is linked to the same biosample separate for the review? Do we want to have this fixed for the review? I am guessing nothing happened on this while I was out? @emileyfadrosh @ssarrafan
@emileyfadrosh @mslarae13 can this be closed or there is work to be done here?
There's still work to be done. The added preparation metadata for NOM will solve that problem when the refactoring work is merged in.
But we haven't identified how we want to do this for sequencing.
Need to add a comment or some indicator / line of text added that indicates "SIP MetaG fraction" and "NOM-Water Extract (Methanol, Chloroform)" to the portal somewhere so it's understood WHY there's 3 metaGs for 1 biosamples