"I'm trying to show my student the searchable BRC terms with the API to incentivize what our vision is — I know there is a link in some running notes we've had in the past. Do you have the link by chance?"
This seemed more like what I was looking for & I sent this to the user.
However, this hasn't been updated & still has "part_of" for the search.
I have not heard back from this user to know if my extended clarification & documentation link helped.
This is what I said "If you’re looking for the biosamples metadata, you’ll use the exact link I have below. The “find” section has a “get /biosamples” and in the “filter” box you’ll put “associated_studies:nmdc:sty-11-e4yb9z58” We have a how- to-guide here: https://nmdc-documentation.readthedocs.io/en/latest/howto_guides/api_gui.html
It needs updated, part_of is now associated_studies to search for a biosample’s metadata."
Hopefully this worked for the user, but knowing to go to the "find" section, and knowing to use "filter" was not intuitive. Let alone the requirement of knowing to use "associated_studies" as the criteria.
A user worked with us to add this study to NMDC: https://data.microbiomedata.org/?q=Ch4IABABGAMiFiJubWRjOnN0eS0xMS1lNHliOXo1OCI
She recently emailed me asking
I responded and explained
However, that wasn't totally intuitive, and she had follow up questions.
I think she meant which "filter, search, sort" ... and I wanted to share some documentation to her.
However, this hasn't been updated & still has "part_of" for the search.
I have not heard back from this user to know if my extended clarification & documentation link helped.
Hopefully this worked for the user, but knowing to go to the "find" section, and knowing to use "filter" was not intuitive. Let alone the requirement of knowing to use "associated_studies" as the criteria.