Open turbomam opened 1 year ago
Here's what I plan to do, with the goal of making the Issues list easier for @turbomam (and other maintainers of the repository) to read and act upon:
Here's a screenshot depicting what I had in mind for "Standardize the Issue titles":
what are the general patterns of things we could do to make the
nmdc-schema
issues more concise, integrated and actionable?
I like to name issues using one of the following two formats (only):
And not:
Here are some examples from recently-created issues:
Current | Proposal | Issue # |
---|---|---|
what predicates should be asserted in visualizations, esp for MIxS slots | Determine which predicates (someone wants to) be asserted... | 1722 |
what to exclude from visualizastion? | Determine what (someone wants me) to exclude from (what) visualization | 1721 |
Do we have a policy about including 'none' as a permissible value in enumerations? | Determine whether NMDC team has... | 1680 |
invalid example data file naming/commenting practice | Standardize file names and comments for example data files | 1679 |
I prefer the ones in the "Proposal" column because I can read the issues list as a kind of "to do" list.
Above, I posted the convention I try to follow for naming issues, along with how I might apply that to some existing issues.
At this point, I don't plan to go through the issues in this repo and do that. So, I will un-assign the issue from myself.
Today, the team talked about the possibility of having a hackathon session where people clean up issues.
what are the general patterns of things we could do to make the nmdc-schema issues more concise, integrated and actionable?
is iterating over the nmdc-schema issues something that could be done with one of the BBOP groups ChatGPT repos?