Closed anastasiyaprymolenna closed 3 months ago
You're talking about https://microbiomedata.github.io/berkeley-schema-fy24/MaterialProcessing/ right?
We should use an aggregative material_processing_set
slot, not one slot for each subclass
We already have it: https://microbiomedata.github.io/berkeley-schema-fy24/planned_process_set/
but that set is specifically for a PlannedProcess
. Can we include each instance of the MaterialProcessing
subtypes in that set?
I will close this issue based on Mark's comments, because we can put all the information we need about the MaterialProcessing
subclasses on the planned_process_set
Currently, no sets exist to be able to store the information that the
MaterialProcess
subclasses hope to capture. There will need to be sets written in for each subclass so the ids of the entries can be used byProtocolExecution
(which also needs a set) class to organize the individual sets into a sequence of processes.