Open dehays opened 3 years ago
@corilo @cmungall I'm removing David and Bill from this issue. Let me know if this is something we should put in the backlog, break down into smaller chunks, or re-assign. I'm so glad you're still here.
It looks to me like the range of OmicsProcessing.has_input
is as wide open as possible right now: NamedThing
.
See https://microbiomedata.github.io/nmdc-schema/OmicsProcessing/#induced
I would actually like to constrain this more now.
We have a Biosample
class, but no classes for modelling blanks or QC samples. That doesn't sound totally unreasonable to me, but I do wonder if we would want to store the results of blank or QC runs in MongoDB.
@anastasiyaprymolenna @corilo is this going to be addressed in the metabolomics squad?
@anastasiyaprymolenna . My understanding is that we have decided that dealing with blanks is beyond the scope at this time (beyond adding the CalibrationInformation
class, which we have completed in the Berkeley fork). If you agree, can you close this issue?
The need here is driven from metabolomics and metaproteomics where @corilo would like to be able to specify the input as one of:
sample blank QC