Open cmungall opened 3 years ago
Thanks - Let me know if we need to talk to the group working on schema.org via ESIP. Happy to connect.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 2:58 PM Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:
for more on Google dataset search: https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/1960710
If we mark up HTML served with RDFa/schema.org this will increase the indexability
There is a proposed extension to schema.org for bioschemas.
This would include classes such as study and dataset:
BioSchemas/specifications#472 https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/472
And a biosample class:
BioSchemas/specifications#323 https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/323
The biosample proposal was a little human-centric for our purposes, what we have is more of an intersection of a biosample and an environmental sample, I am not sure if there are
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/microbiomedata/pilot/issues/52, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADFUG4S4KTTLOHHT5AVDLYTSU7SZFANCNFSM4U5C4C3A .
-- Elisha M Wood-Charlson, PhD (she/her) KBase https://kbase.us/ User Engagement Lead; @DOEKBase https://twitter.com/doekbase NMDC http://microbiomedata.org/ Leadership Team; @microbiomedata https://twitter.com/MicrobiomeData Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/elishawc, Twitter https://twitter.com/ElishaMariePhD (personal)
Yes, definitely! We can use this ticket for initial discussions and then see if we need to set up a call
I'm aware of bio-efforts to extend schema.org (bioschemas) but not sure if there is an analogous envoschemas
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:50 PM Elisha WC notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks - Let me know if we need to talk to the group working on schema.org via ESIP. Happy to connect.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 2:58 PM Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:
for more on Google dataset search: https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/1960710
If we mark up HTML served with RDFa/schema.org this will increase the indexability
There is a proposed extension to schema.org for bioschemas.
This would include classes such as study and dataset:
BioSchemas/specifications#472 https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/472
And a biosample class:
BioSchemas/specifications#323 https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/323
The biosample proposal was a little human-centric for our purposes, what we have is more of an intersection of a biosample and an environmental sample, I am not sure if there are
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/microbiomedata/pilot/issues/52, or unsubscribe < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADFUG4S4KTTLOHHT5AVDLYTSU7SZFANCNFSM4U5C4C3A
.
-- Elisha M Wood-Charlson, PhD (she/her) KBase https://kbase.us/ User Engagement Lead; @DOEKBase https://twitter.com/doekbase NMDC http://microbiomedata.org/ Leadership Team; @microbiomedata https://twitter.com/MicrobiomeData Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/elishawc, Twitter https://twitter.com/ElishaMariePhD (personal)
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/microbiomedata/pilot/issues/52#issuecomment-745710684, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOM6R4PMYDKDXY5XKK3SVAG6LANCNFSM4U5C4C3A .
https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 6:10 PM Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:
Yes, definitely! We can use this ticket for initial discussions and then see if we need to set up a call
I'm aware of bio-efforts to extend schema.org (bioschemas) but not sure if there is an analogous envoschemas
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:50 PM Elisha WC notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks - Let me know if we need to talk to the group working on schema.org via ESIP. Happy to connect.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 2:58 PM Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:
for more on Google dataset search: https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/1960710
If we mark up HTML served with RDFa/schema.org this will increase the indexability
There is a proposed extension to schema.org for bioschemas.
This would include classes such as study and dataset:
BioSchemas/specifications#472 https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/472
And a biosample class:
BioSchemas/specifications#323 https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/323
The biosample proposal was a little human-centric for our purposes, what we have is more of an intersection of a biosample and an environmental sample, I am not sure if there are
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/microbiomedata/pilot/issues/52, or unsubscribe <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADFUG4S4KTTLOHHT5AVDLYTSU7SZFANCNFSM4U5C4C3A
.
-- Elisha M Wood-Charlson, PhD (she/her) KBase https://kbase.us/ User Engagement Lead; @DOEKBase https://twitter.com/doekbase NMDC http://microbiomedata.org/ Leadership Team; @microbiomedata https://twitter.com/MicrobiomeData Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/elishawc, Twitter https://twitter.com/ElishaMariePhD (personal)
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/microbiomedata/pilot/issues/52#issuecomment-745710684>, or unsubscribe < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOM6R4PMYDKDXY5XKK3SVAG6LANCNFSM4U5C4C3A
.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/microbiomedata/pilot/issues/52#issuecomment-745716639, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADFUG4XID3S7X7KHTGKRQLTSVAJIDANCNFSM4U5C4C3A .
-- Elisha M Wood-Charlson, PhD (she/her) KBase https://kbase.us/ User Engagement Lead; @DOEKBase https://twitter.com/doekbase NMDC http://microbiomedata.org/ Leadership Team; @microbiomedata https://twitter.com/MicrobiomeData Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/elishawc, Twitter https://twitter.com/ElishaMariePhD (personal)
and we dumped some resources here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rvEoEw8FU5ewmaiXnLen_Jc1x7nJ2VTAtgyzQfbwyjs/edit
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 6:18 PM Elisha Wood-Charlson < emwood-charlson@lbl.gov> wrote:
https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 6:10 PM Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:
Yes, definitely! We can use this ticket for initial discussions and then see if we need to set up a call
I'm aware of bio-efforts to extend schema.org (bioschemas) but not sure if there is an analogous envoschemas
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:50 PM Elisha WC notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks - Let me know if we need to talk to the group working on schema.org via ESIP. Happy to connect.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 2:58 PM Chris Mungall <notifications@github.com
wrote:
for more on Google dataset search: https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/1960710
If we mark up HTML served with RDFa/schema.org this will increase the indexability
There is a proposed extension to schema.org for bioschemas.
This would include classes such as study and dataset:
BioSchemas/specifications#472 https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/472
And a biosample class:
BioSchemas/specifications#323 https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/323
The biosample proposal was a little human-centric for our purposes, what we have is more of an intersection of a biosample and an environmental sample, I am not sure if there are
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/microbiomedata/pilot/issues/52, or unsubscribe <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADFUG4S4KTTLOHHT5AVDLYTSU7SZFANCNFSM4U5C4C3A
.
-- Elisha M Wood-Charlson, PhD (she/her) KBase https://kbase.us/ User Engagement Lead; @DOEKBase https://twitter.com/doekbase NMDC http://microbiomedata.org/ Leadership Team; @microbiomedata https://twitter.com/MicrobiomeData Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/elishawc, Twitter https://twitter.com/ElishaMariePhD (personal)
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/microbiomedata/pilot/issues/52#issuecomment-745710684 , or unsubscribe < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOM6R4PMYDKDXY5XKK3SVAG6LANCNFSM4U5C4C3A
.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/microbiomedata/pilot/issues/52#issuecomment-745716639, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADFUG4XID3S7X7KHTGKRQLTSVAJIDANCNFSM4U5C4C3A .
-- Elisha M Wood-Charlson, PhD (she/her) KBase https://kbase.us/ User Engagement Lead; @DOEKBase https://twitter.com/doekbase NMDC http://microbiomedata.org/ Leadership Team; @microbiomedata https://twitter.com/MicrobiomeData Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/elishawc, Twitter https://twitter.com/ElishaMariePhD (personal)
-- Elisha M Wood-Charlson, PhD (she/her) KBase https://kbase.us/ User Engagement Lead; @DOEKBase https://twitter.com/doekbase NMDC http://microbiomedata.org/ Leadership Team; @microbiomedata https://twitter.com/MicrobiomeData Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/elishawc, Twitter https://twitter.com/ElishaMariePhD (personal)
Not meaning to muddy the waters, but I just ran across Facebook's Open Graph:
It looks like there is a lot of development to do on it. But my first impression is that it can be easily extended.
Thanks for the science-on-schema link @elishawc! Very useful. This is how Pangaea are doing it:
https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org/issues/27#issuecomment-747414365
What's the relative priority of this development vs. getting actual metadata into the system?
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:07 AM Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks for the science-on-schema link @elishawc https://github.com/elishawc! Very useful. This is how Pangaea are doing it:
ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org#27 (comment) https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org/issues/27#issuecomment-747414365
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/microbiomedata/pilot/issues/52#issuecomment-747605947, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALPGD5LWFFKFCDB32PLKSLSVJCFZANCNFSM4U5C4C3A .
Notes from ESIP 2020 winter meeting
Software - JSON-LD, RDF JS
g.co/datasetsearch Take schema.org tables and “clean” by normalizing (fields?), place into knowledge graph (people, places, things, geolocation) and google scholar if can find mentions
This is for the FAIR aim (in aim 1, but requires aim 3 help)
for more on Google dataset search: https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/1960710
Example of dataset search:
https://datasetsearch.research.google.com/search?query=saline%20lake%20biome&docid=QO%2FFv5GrKn0IrD%2FyAAAAAA%3D%3D
You can see that omics dataset indexes like omicsDI and datamed are indexed, as well as GBIF, datadryad etc - but no specialized metagenome registries
If we mark up HTML served with RDFa/schema.org this will increase the indexability
There is a proposed extension to schema.org for bioschemas.
This would include classes such as study and dataset:
https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/472
And a biosample class:
https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/323
The biosample proposal was a little human-centric for our purposes, what we have is more of an intersection of a biosample and an environmental sample, I am not sure if there are