Closed mischah closed 5 years ago
Itβs a trend that tools make it possible to store their settings in a field in the package.json. I recently enabled Baumeister to handle his configuration this way. See #270 β feat: enable to define baumeister config in package.json.
package.json
Iβd like the approach, because the project root is less cluttered with dotfiles and you can see all the configs in one place.
This way we can get rid of the following files:
/.babelrc /.eslintrc.json /.prettierrc /.stylelintrc.json /baumeister.json
On the other hand this bloats the package.json like you can see in the diff.
Opinions please @phlmn @nicolaisueper @Paquan @chrkhl @krnlde (π / π)
Itβs a trend that tools make it possible to store their settings in a field in the
package.json
. I recently enabled Baumeister to handle his configuration this way. See #270 β feat: enable to define baumeister config in package.json.Iβd like the approach, because the project root is less cluttered with dotfiles and you can see all the configs in one place.
This way we can get rid of the following files:
On the other hand this bloats the
package.json
like you can see in the diff.Opinions please @phlmn @nicolaisueper @Paquan @chrkhl @krnlde (π / π)