Closed Teamop closed 5 years ago
According to the recent update in micromatch/expand-braces#2, it's because the cases are wrong, but do you think if it's worth to provide a way for backwards compatibility? seems a lot of packages depends on it.
do you think if it's worth to provide a way for backwards compatibility? seems a lot of packages depends on it.
I think we'll always be better off staying as close to established conventions as possible. IMHO you can easily get around the "issue" by designing your brace pattern differently.
First, Travis log from micromatch/expand-braces#2
I think for braces expand with single item, in v 1.8.5, default is
in v2.3.2, the default
That's the reason why the cases failed
but @jonschlinkert said that this is unrelated, so could you elaborate a bit? thanks