search

micronutrientsupport / feedback-imagery

0 stars 0 forks source link

New Feedback: For iron, somewhere we need to... #60

Open MicronutrientSupportBot opened 2 years ago

MicronutrientSupportBot commented 2 years ago

New feedback report from tool interface

bgsandan commented 2 years ago

@kpitten Do you have a suggestion for a simple sentence or two to indicate that adequacy was assessed using the full probability method and iron absorption assumptions? If not, is there any other project team member you would suggest contacting?

I was thinking this could appear in the pale purple panel at the top (between the 'These data' paragraph and the matching statistics). Would that make sense to you?

kpitten commented 2 years ago

How about something like (though we need to check with Kevin that he did in fact assume 10%):

Bioavailability of iron from dietary sources was assumed to be 10%. Adequacy of iron was assessed using the full probability method.

And yes, I think your idea for placement sounds good!

From: Andrew Bean @.> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2022 6:56 AM To: micronutrientsupport/feedback-imagery @.> Cc: Katherine Adams @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [micronutrientsupport/feedback-imagery] New Feedback: For iron, somewhere we need to... (Issue #60)

@kpittenhttps://github.com/kpitten Do you have a suggestion for a simple sentence or two to indicate that adequacy was assessed using the full probability method and iron absorption assumptions? If not, is there any other project team member you would suggest contacting?

I was thinking this could appear in the pale purple panel at the top (between the 'These data' paragraph and the matching statistics). Would that make sense to you?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/micronutrientsupport/feedback-imagery/issues/60#issuecomment-1113279938, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJAPOVDO4MA55APL33JZDMDVHPL6RANCNFSM5UUG22ZA. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.**@.>>