Open Azquelt opened 1 month ago
Hello all, the EMO is trying to avoid duplication of release records, so we will be providing our feedback and comments related to this release directly here.
EDP Review status: EMO Completed - Awaiting ballot results. @Azquelt please consider adding the Security file to your project repository.
PMI record: URL
EF Specification Process
Intellectual Property Management
Open Source Rules of Engagement
General:
Things to check:
Branding and Trademarks The following applies when the project has a custom website. To the best of our knowledge:
Things to check:
Legal Documentation Required files:
Recommended files:
See examples for Security file and Code of Conduct.
Required elements:
Recommended elements:
Metadata (PMI)
The ballot passed. https://www.eclipse.org/lists/microprofile-wg/msg02605.html
Specification issue template
When creating a specification project release review, create an issue in the MicroProfile-WG repository repo with the content defined as follows.
[x] Specification name and version
[x] Add the label
Release Review
[x] Naming conventions for artifacts:
[x] The Nexus Staging links (orgeclipsemicroprofile-NNNN where NNNN is the staging repository id) (eg, https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgeclipsemicroprofile-NNNN/org/eclipse/microprofile/config/) which contain all the binaries and relevant documentation:
[x] A link in the Eclipse downloads sections is still available for specs and apidocs:
[x] Summary that a Compatible Implementation is complete, passes the TCK, and that the TCK includes sufficient coverage of the specification.
[x] Release Review