I think this would be best captured using one table-wrap containing two table elements, since (my understanding is) table-wrap-group is intended as a grouping of numerous tables each with their own labels/captions (and this is not the case for this content).
However if table-wrap-group is preferred, then the label/title should be moved up as a child of table-wrap-group since it's applicable to both objects (I suspect the @id should also be on the table-wrap-group instead):
In the latest ijm-00187.xml file,
table-wrap-group
has been used to capture two tables with the same overall label/title.The label and title have been captured as a child of the first
table-wrap
(not the group):I think this would be best captured using one
table-wrap
containing twotable
elements, since (my understanding is)table-wrap-group
is intended as a grouping of numerous tables each with their own labels/captions (and this is not the case for this content).However if
table-wrap-group
is preferred, then the label/title should be moved up as a child oftable-wrap-group
since it's applicable to both objects (I suspect the@id
should also be on thetable-wrap-group
instead):