search

microsimulation / ijm-xml

XML files for the International Journal of Microsimulation
MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

ijm-00002.xml page numbers #142

Closed fred-atherden closed 5 years ago

fred-atherden commented 5 years ago

In ijm-00002.xml page numbers are currently captured using sec/title. This means that the article will have strange nesting/TOC.

Suggest including them as roman or bold text in the appropriate p element (or other content container):

<p><bold>[116]</bold> Existing models of our socio-economic system have proved to be of rather ... </p>

An alternative would be to use processing-instructions:

<p><?page value-of="[116]"?> Existing models of our socio-economic system have proved to be of rather ... </p>

But there's no guarantee these would display in Libero, since this has not yet been discussed.

Another alternative would be named-content:

<p> ... [<named-content content-type="page-number">116</named-content>] ... </p>
Melissa37 commented 5 years ago

@FAtherden-eLife do any open source publishers publish conference proceedings? I wonder whether we could look at that as a model for this?

fred-atherden commented 5 years ago

@FAtherden-eLife do any open source publishers publish conference proceedings? I wonder whether we could look at that as a model for this?

@Melissa37, yes, but I've only been able to find full text available as PDF. Outside of TEI (in which pb is used), I've mostly seen pages captured as processing instructions elsewhere.

As far as I'm aware, there's no prescriptive tag in JATS for in-text page numbers. Another alternative to throw into the mix would be something like:

<p> ... [<named-content content-type="page-number">116</named-content>] ... </p>

I'll add that into the ticket above.

Melissa37 commented 5 years ago

@FAtherden-eLife I think your first suggestion would be the best approach to prevent working being done for a one-off archive article :-) But that's my opinion

<p><bold>[116]</bold> Existing models of our socio-economic system have proved to be of rather ... </p>

Thanks!

fred-atherden commented 5 years ago

@FAtherden-eLife I think your first suggestion would be the best approach to prevent working being done for a one-off archive article :-) But that's my opinion

Sounds good - thanks! I can't add this ticket to the 'Resupply required' column in the project (presumably due to permissions), so would appreciate if you could do that for me!

Melissa37 commented 5 years ago

Done! That's weird, we should look at that tomorrow

fred-atherden commented 5 years ago

Thanks!