Closed sgiordy closed 3 years ago
Hi! Welcome to the AL repository! Please take a minute to familiarize yourself with the purpose of this repository https://github.com/microsoft/AL/blob/master/README.MD and with the FAQ https://github.com/microsoft/AL/wiki/Frequently-Asked-Questions .
We believe that the issue you have opened is outside the scope of this repository.
We are aware that the table extension implementation is not ideal in all scenarios. We are working on improving this design, one effort being the support for partial records https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/business-central/dev-itpro/developer/devenv-partial-records .
Although we appreciate the feedback, this repository is not the right place to post it (I am aware the issue was transferred from ALAppExtensions). I suggest that you use the appropriate channel to ensure that your feedback gets to the right teams.
Dear all,
smart people admit mistakes and TableExtensions are the first cause of performance killing in BC. What designers expects? That BC will be used for 1 invoice a day?
What does it means this KB?
Seems a joke! The author cannot be serious!
And what about this undocumented behaviour?
KB says:
But omits that the behaviour exists also in case of TableExtensions.
OK, prefix are a good idea. OK, GUID to avoid collision are a good idea.
But splitting tables you wasted years of performance research; you prevent to add keys mixing standard and custom fields; you confuse SQL optimizer with incredible queries.
Have you ever run a SQL Profiler in a mid-size installation with dozen of APPS? I think no or your designers are missing pratical sense.
We need, you need to revert TableExtensions to old simple and effective behaviour. Adding field to tables! With prefix and GUID you don't need to split anything and 8K record limit is very very rare.
I repeat: smart people admit mistakes.
Thank you. S.