[Remove Internal] Table 8068 "Sales Service Commitment" in "Subscription & Recurring Billing" App

[PierreGlicinski]

Describe the request

As described in the title, I would like to request whether the "Access = Internal" from the table "Sales Service Commitment" can be removed.

Why?

The app is already being delivered in cloud systems and is automatically installed there. Since my customers can already use this functionality, I am now under pressure as a "partner" to integrate the corresponding app into my own apps.

If I read the code correctly, there are two fundamental checks to determine whether the corresponding record is a recurring invoice:

The "Recurring Billing" flag, which I can access externally. A check for "IsContractRenewal." At this point, entries in the "Sales Service Commitment" table are searched for. However, I cannot access this point externally and, therefore, cannot determine whether "Recurring Billing" is necessary.

I can understand that events are not available everywhere right away. I can also understand that not all functions or codeunits are open. But when it comes to tables, I really don't understand this approach at all.

As of now, putting the "dirty tricks" aside, I have no way to read records from this table and, therefore, cannot perform the necessary checks to determine whether a recurring invoice is being used at all.

If app combinations lead to errors, the current situation creates a rather unpleasant problem for me.

Therefore, my request???and my thanks in advance! Best regards, Pierre

Additional context

Remove Internal from Table Internal work item: AB#558488

[BardurKnudsen]

Sounds very reasonable to me.

[AndersLarsenMicrosoft]

As state on Yammer we will start opening up with 26 for subscription billing

[AndersLarsenMicrosoft]

se above