Open BinarySpike opened 3 months ago
Hi @BinarySpike,
I'd like to wait for a debugger to attach, but not pause directly after.
Interesting. Can you describe a situation in which this capability would be useful? To put it another way, why is AwaitDebuggerAndPause
problematic in your case?
Would adding a flag and skipping the identified line be a reasonable way to implement this?
Well, we wouldn't want to make the API too clunky – e.g., AwaitDebuggerAndPause | DontActuallyPause
😅. Perhaps we could deprecate AwaitDebuggerAndPause
and replace it with a pair of new flags.
Thanks!
@BinarySpike Hey Nathan small world its Todd, what you using ClearScript for?
why is
AwaitDebuggerAndPause
problematic in your case?
Two issues, first if I Thread.Sleep(5000)
before the execution, the debugger attaches during the sleep and the execution never pauses. Second, if I put a breakpoint deep in my code, it pauses at the beginning and I have to hit continue to reach the next breakpoint—this is just really annoying.
replace it with a pair of new flags.
That would be my preference. Seems the logical solution.
@BinarySpike Hey Nathan small world its Todd, what you using ClearScript for?
@wysisoft ! Mostly looking at it for a hobby project. However, I'm looking at exposing a partial API of our application layer so that we can implement configurable business logic. We have a system that manages tons of files & folders and each tenant uses the system differently. Being able to deploy a tenant, then build them a script where they can enter properties, then hit a button and the script creates files, creates folders, and applies permissions based on their specific needs would be chefs kiss 😗👌
Hi,
i would also like this.
Kind regards, David
For performance/quality-of-life reasons, I'd like to wait for a debugger to attach, but not pause directly after. See: https://github.com/microsoft/ClearScript/blob/1ba26876fc9dc1dd290fac657914cc1a8cf4c487/ClearScriptV8/V8IsolateImpl.cpp#L737C1-L737C25
Would adding a flag and skipping the identified line be a reasonable way to implement this?