Open chjjma opened 2 years ago
Will look into it.
Do you have any update?
Same here. I used the given scripts on ZINC subset, then got an best validation loss 0.1750 and corresponding test MAE 0.1406. I'll continue trying on other hyperparameters.
@chjjma By the way, have you successfully reproduced the results on ZINC subset? Thx!
Same here. I'm sure I used the original code and there is no problem with the environment configuration. However, the test MAE result I reproduced on the ZINC subset is 0.178.
Same here :(
Hi, First, thanks for the code. I tried to reproduce the result of ZINC subset with graphormer v2 code, but my best validation loss was 0.178 with parameters in the given script with test loss 0.164, and 0.186 with parameters in the paper with test loss 0.157. The latter script's code is as follows:
Thanks in advance.