microsoft / PowerToys

Windows system utilities to maximize productivity
MIT License
109.66k stars 6.46k forks source link

FancyZone - Unable to identify the screen I'm using #34701

Open lincoln90 opened 1 week ago

lincoln90 commented 1 week ago

Microsoft PowerToys version

0.84.0

Installation method

PowerToys auto-update

Running as admin

Yes

Area(s) with issue?

FancyZones, FancyZones Editor

Steps to reproduce

This screenshot is when I try to use FancyZone スクリーンショット 2024-09-08 000211

This screenshot shows how the zones appear when I open the FancyZone editor. Notice that it's only showing me one 4K monitor. スクリーンショット 2024-09-08 000735

This screenshot is of the Windows monitor configuration screen. See that I have two monitors connected and working スクリーンショット 2024-09-08 000627

This screenshot is configuration of second monitor スクリーンショット 2024-09-08 001856

Supplemental Information OS: Windows 11 22H2 4K monitors are connected to GTX1050ti LG monitor is connected to motherboard (internal GPU) Both are HDMI connected.

I tried reinstalling PowerToys, but it didn't help.

✔️ Expected Behavior

  1. I want the window sizes set in FancyZone to be reproduced as they are.
  2. FancyZone is not recognizing the second monitor.

Supplemental information about case 1 After setting the scale to 100% and setting the FancyZone, the scale can be set back to 125% to make it somewhat usable. However, since this is a backdoor technique, it would be most convenient if it could be set without any fiddling if possible.

❌ Actual Behavior

  1. In the current state, the editor properly saves the visible size, but when the scale is changed in Windows settings, FancyZone seems to fix it at 100% scale. If possible, I'd be happy if it could adjust according to the scale setting.
  2. I don't know why, but the FancyZone editor does not recognize the second monitor no matter what I do.

Other Software

No response

similar-issues-ai[bot] commented 1 week ago

We've found some similar issues:

If any of the above are duplicates, please consider closing this issue out and adding additional context in the original issue.

Note: You can give me feedback by 👍 or 👎 this comment.