Open PDavidFL opened 1 year ago
@PDavidFL We do take into account the simulation region when estimating the costs. If you would be willing to send us your
Hi Noel, sure, thanks for checking this out! LVL_NV04_Partitions_02_AcousticsData_config_xml.txt
Another discovery that might help investigating this: we have performed a new modified bake from the same game level, and the bake time was very close to the estimated value this time!
The changes we made on the config:
Attached the config file for this one as well: LVL_NV04_Partitions_03_AcousticsData_config_xml.txt
@PDavidFL Thank you for providing the additional configuration information. I haven't yet had time to look at this, but I have logged this issue in our internal tracking database and will look into this again when the time is right in our development cycle. Thank you for reporting this.
Hi team,
First of all, thank you for your hard work on this super cool project! My team and I think it's a real game changer. :)
I'd like ask about a finding that we have since we started to experiment with cloud baking for larger areas. What we found is that the estimated bake times are quite far from the actual time spent on the processing.
For example, for our last bake, we requested 25 (F8s V2) nodes for about 7700 probes. The 'Estimated Bake Time' showed 27 min, and the 'Estimated Compute Cost' was 11 h 30 min. Unfortunately the bake took about 6.5 h and costed about 13 times more as initially calculated... Similar differences happened to our previous two bakes as well. (We use UE5 with Wwise 2021 and have the latest PA version installed.)
According to Azure Monitoring, the number of utilized nodes was more or less staying on 25, so that's probably not the problem.
Of course, these are just estimates but we are wondering if the differences we experience (more than 10x) are normal or there is some problem with our configuration or something else?
A guess from my side is that the actual bake ignores our custom Simulation Region setup for some reason? (Ours: [4000 x 4000 x 1400] vs Default: [9000 x 9000 x 3500] --> ~12.7x diff )
Cheers, David