Open lukewlms opened 5 years ago
This could be a definition of has
that would work as you expect:
declare namespace Reflect {
function has<T, K extends PropertyKey>(target: T, propertyKey: K): target is Extract<T, Record<K, any>>;
}
const test2 = (a: { field: number } | {}) => Reflect.has(a, 'field') ? a.field : a;
As a workaround you could add it yourself.
Looks like that does work as a stopgap! Thanks for the suggestion, added that in our custom types code.
TypeScript Version: ^3.4.0-dev.20190330
Search Terms: Reflect.has in operator
Code
Expected behavior: Both compile successfully. "in" operator acts as a type guard per https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/10485. Reflect.has should act the same as "in" operator here.
We'd like to use Reflect.has a lot more and this case holds us back. Thank you!
Actual behavior: "in" operator line compiles;
Reflect.has
line does not compile. Error:445 Reflect.has(a, "field") ? a.field : 0;
Playground Link:
https://goo.gl/2R4dkS
Related Issues:
https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/10485