microsoft / TypeScript

TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
https://www.typescriptlang.org
Apache License 2.0
100.41k stars 12.41k forks source link

[libdom] Allow Response / Request to be generics #52777

Open karlhorky opened 1 year ago

karlhorky commented 1 year ago

Suggestion

🔍 Search Terms

request, response, libdom, generic, generics, type parameters

✅ Viability Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

⭐ Suggestion

Similar to the FormData request by @wesbos in https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/43797, it would be great if the Request and Response globals could also accept generic type parameters.

This will become more relevant as more frameworks continue to increase their usage of these standard globals, also in Node.js.

Consider the following example of an App Route handler in Next.js (handling a POST request to an API route):

export async function POST(request: Request): Response {
  const body = await request.json();
     // ^? const body: any ❌
  return new Response(JSON.stringify({
    abc: 123, // ❌ POST function return type cannot check type of response body object
  }))
}

What would be amazing would be something similar to this:

type RequestBody = { zzz: number };
type ResponseBody = { abc: number };

export async function POST(request: Request<RequestBody>): Response<ResponseBody> {
  const body = await request.json();
     // ^? const body: { zzz: number } ✅
  return new Response(JSON.stringify({
    abc: 123, // ✅ type checked
  }))
}

📃 Motivating Example

The second example in the Suggestion section above.

💻 Use Cases

For typing the response body of API routes

Prior Art

@types/express: Request and Response types - which both accept a generic type parameter.

Workaround

Response

Wasn't able to find a nice workaround for typing the body of a Response yet.

Request

Using Type Assertion / casting via as:

type RequestBody = { zzz: string };

export async function POST(request: Request) {
  const body = await request.json() as RequestBody;

Caveats

  1. Arguably, the Request body is unknown until runtime, so this is better handled instead with Zod or some other runtime validation. But for quick/simple projects without this validation, it's nice to be able to type the request body type.
MartinJohns commented 1 year ago

IMO the same reason applies here: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/33037#issuecomment-524384825

Same thing why JSON.parse() is not generic.

karlhorky commented 1 year ago

JSON.parse() is only one part of the equation - the parsed request body. That is why I wrote the caveat in the issue above:

  1. Arguably, the Request body is unknown until runtime, so this is better handled instead with Zod or some other runtime validation. But for quick/simple projects without this validation, it's nice to be able to type the request body type.

Type checking the return value of a function (the Response part of this proposal) is a statically analyzable way to enforce the response shapes of API handlers (eg. especially useful with the new Response.json() static method) and does not have anything to do with the "JSON data off the wire" mentioned in your linked comment.

k1eu commented 1 month ago

@karlhorky You might like this. (I saw you on my TypedFormData package! :) I build a very small wrapper around fetch, Request and Response for this particular issues :) Ofc it's fully compatible with regular interfaces. You can check it out here! https://github.com/k1eu/typed-request